Category Archives: Academia

5 free ways around the great paywall of academia.

The_Great_Wall_of_China_at_Jinshanling

Picture: Severin. Stalder CC BY-SA 3.0 via wikimedia commons

If you do not have subscription access to academic journals through an institution then to access a large proportion of academic journals you will be charged a fee for each paper; fees of $30 or more per article are common. And if you need to access a lot of papers then the cost quickly adds up. Needless to  say many people don’t have the means to pay. Of course you could stick to open access journals i.e. free to read and download (Head to the directory of Open Access Journals for easy access to a whole range of open access journals), but by doing so you will miss a lot of what’s happening in the academic world*.

If you can’t afford to pay then you have a few options to get around the paywalls.

Here are  5 ways around the great paywall of academia;

  1. The Snail Trail (legal but painfully slow): Some journals allow researchers to archive a full copy of their paper immediately on publication, on a personal webpage or university database (others have an embargo period,typically 12 to 24 months, after which papers can be added). Many also allow the authors a certain number of free access codes. To access this option takes time. You have to personally contact authors  and hope they respond, or leave academic databases and search the web for personal webpage hosted versions, or access university databases. You can also often source the paper on ResearchGate or Academia (think academic LinkedIn if you don’t know what these are). Obviously someone relying on these methods is going to have to spend a lot more chasing up references than someone who has full subscription access. Method rating: 2/5 paywalled papers. This method is close to obsolete if you are needing lots of papers. I would always try some of the options below first. About the only plus is if you specifically want to talk to a researcher; then asking for their paper directly is a good way to start up the conversation.

2. The Open Access Button (legal): The Open Access Button instantly searches for a freely accessible version of the article or dataset you need. If unable to get access to an article you can create a request.

Rating 3.5/5. It is a little hit and miss sometimes but it is getting better.

3. Unpaywall (legal): The new kid on the block is unpaywall. An extension for chrome and firefox, it is still in beta testing with a full release date of the 4th of April…but it works now. I could source about 60% of the articles I tested. This one is a great tool and I suspect it will only get better. Combine it with the open access button and some snail trailing and you should be able to get to almost everything.

Rating 3.5/5.  Super easy to use and although its at beta stage it works really well. Like the open access button it is only going to get better. The biggest downfall with both is that the papers they are most likely to struggle to access are papers that have just been published and are potentially the cutting edge research.

4. Sci Hubb (Questionable): While Sci Hubb can get you almost any paper (and often very very quickly), depending on where you are and what you are downloading you run the risk of breaking copyright laws. Called the academic pirate bay by the big publishers, sci hubb obtains copies of papers by various means, including scraping of publisher sites (this is different to unpaywall and the open access button that find PDFs uploaded by the authors themselves).

Rating: In short you can get anything here but, and its a big BUT, you are taking some risks.

Who is downloading ‘pirate’ copies of academic papers? Well according to SCIENCE (one of the more prestigious academic journals) everyone is.  Still, especially with the options at 2 and 3 available, it might be best to avoid Sci Hubb.

5. #icanhazpdf (Questionable: depending what you are asking for)apparently you can also try this method…tweet the name of the paper you need with the #icanhazpdf hashtag and its likely someone will send it to you. I can’t see it being very effective for sourcing lots of papers but perhaps if you just need one that you can’t track down it could be useful.

Rating: 1/5  Not my cup of tea…if I want an authors archived version i’ll just ask them, otherwise there are better options.

If you have used any of these options and have some thoughts or know of any other good options then feel free to throw them in the comments.

 

*for now anyway. e.g. Europe for example is pushing forward with making their academics publish in open access format as the norm.

The Stand: Why are we scared to go in the water?

stand-2

“The chances of falling victim to a shark attack are incredibly slim, yet these majestic creatures represent one of mankind’s greatest fears. In a world where every shark encounter is front page news, can we fight back against this distorted perception?”

Continue reading

Honours and post-grad funding list (for ecology research) Updated!

big-fish-bites-hook-dollar-sign-56944751

This is an updated version of what has been one of our most read blog post. There are new grants added, details updated ands its now in date order so its easier to see which ones are close to submission date. It does have an Australian focus but there are some international ones as well, we hope to add to those down the track.
Continue reading

Make your assignment marker happy

While I am reblogging things; I have been meaning to reblog this post of Martins for a while. He has written a useful little document (that you can download) outlining many of the basic grammar and formatting mistakes that students make in their reports (and that apparently make him miserable haha). Lets be honest, I made a few of the mistakes as well so I found it quite useful myself but perhaps its best use is being passed onto undergrads when you are going mark their work ;). I’ll let Martin do the rest of the talking…

Squiddled thoughts

The dreaded red pen. The dreaded red pen. An example of a very frustrated marker. I hope my feedback was a little less personal (this is NOT a picture of my marking). 

Recently I’ve been marking for some second and third year biology classes. I’ve been a little shocked at the quality of the work the students have been presenting. I found myself wondering whether I was marking them too hard? However, I soon came to the conclusion that this was not the case.

One of the classes is a third year class and some of these students are on the cusp of completing a Bachelor of Science without knowing whether to use “two”, “to” or “too”. It’s a scary thought. I would like to think that these students wouldn’t be able to complete their degrees with such appalling spelling and grammar, but let’s face it, they’ve made it through to the final semester of their undergraduate degrees…

View original post 447 more words